Georgia Tech EDI
Local
Economic Review of Tattnall County, Georgia
Overview[1]
Located
in Southeastern Georgia, Tattnall County was created in 1801 from parts of
Montgomery and Washington counties. It
is approximately one hour from Savannah.
Tattnall County is a Tier 1 community located in Region 9, the Heart of Georgia-Altamaha River area. Most of its neighboring counties are also Tier 1 communities, due to relatively high unemployment, low per capita income, and high poverty rates. The county’s economic base has agricultural roots. Tattnall is the state’s largest producer of Vidalia sweet onions and hosts the Glennville Sweet Onion Festival each year in honor of the county’ significant production. Tattnall’s largest employers include Claxton Poultry Co., Evans Memorial Hospital / Glennville Nursing Home, Rotary Corporation, and Georgia Department of Corrections.
The Wiregrass Trail and the Woodpecker Trail both run through Tattnall County. The county has five incorporated communities: Cobbtown, Collins, Glennville, Reidsville, and Manassas. Nearly, 70 percent of the residents in Tattnall County live in unincorporated areas.
The Tattnall County Development Authority is responsible for economic development activity in the county.
Socioeconomic data were gathered and analyzed for Tattnall County and comparable counties. Groupings of comparable counties include the Heart of Georgia-Altamaha Region (Region 9), the Tattnall County Labor Market Area (LMA), and a peer group of three counties.
The Heart of Georgia-Altamaha Region (Region 9) includes Tattnall County and the following 16 counties:
Appling County
Bleckley County
Candler County
Dodge County
Emanuel County
Evans County
Jeff Davis County
Johnson County
Laurens County
Montgomery County
Telfair County
Toombs County
Treutlen County
Wayne County
Wheeler County
Wilcox County
The Labor Market Area
The Georgia Department of Labor (DOL) defines Tattnall ’s Georgia Labor Market Area (LMA) as including counties from two different regions, Region 9 and Region 12. The economic ties between the following counties and Tattnall provide the basis for logical comparison.
Appling County
Candler County
Emanuel County
Evans County
Liberty County (Region 12)
Long County (Region 12)
Toombs County
Wayne County
Although it is important to compare Tattnall County to counties within its region and LMA, counties often exhibit similarities to others that are not within close geographic proximity. Therefore, to provide a better understanding of where Tattnall County is doing well and areas where there is room for improvement, it is important to relate it to a peer group of most similar counties. To determine the peer group for Tattnall, Georgia counties were screened according to the following criteria:
1. Counties with a population that fell within a range of 75 to 125 percent of Tattnall’s population
2. Counties outside an urban area (that is, rural counties)
3. Counties that have received a Tier 1 designation as defined under the OneGeorgia program
4. Counties without direct interstate highway access
5. Counties located in south Georgia
6. Counties with a similar percentage of their residents living in unincorporated areas.
The initial measure reviewed was population, as it does not make sense to compare Tattnall County to other communities that are significantly larger or smaller in size and, therefore, have different dynamics at play within their economies. Counties located in metropolitan areas were excluded because Tattnall County does not have a nearby central city that acts as an economic engine.
Because Tattnall is a Tier 1 county, only other Tier 1 counties were considered for comparison. The county lacks direct interstate highway access and is several miles from an interstate. Consequently, counties not experiencing similar geographic isolation were excluded. As Tattnall is a south Georgia county, counties located elsewhere in the state were not considered. Nearly 70 percent of Tattnall County’s population live in unincorporated areas, indicating that a significant portion of the community’s residents can’t benefit from city-maintained infrastructure and services. The final criterion, therefore, was that only counties with a similar approximation of their residents living in unincorporated areas were included in the comparison.
Tattnall County’s peer group includes three counties.
Dodge County (Region 9)
Wayne County (Region 9)
Worth County (Region 10)
Socioeconomic
Performance Measures
Economic development is often measured in terms of job growth, but this measure alone does not explain the well-being of the residents within a community. To understand whether economic development has truly reached the individual resident, one must review other measures such as social, health, and educational statistics.
Tattnall County’s performance according to 16 key socioeconomic measures has been reviewed in context to its region, LMA, peer group, and state. These measures are:
ü Population Growth
ü Per Capita Income
ü Job
Growth
ü Unemployment Rate
ü Bank Deposits Per Capita
ü Manufacturing Employment
ü Poverty Rate
ü Teenage Pregnancy Rate
ü Infant Mortality Rate
ü Food Stamp Participation Rate
ü High School Dropout Rate
ü Education Test Scores
Tattnall County has been compared to its peer group counties – those counties to which it is most similar – for the following additional economic development measures.
ü Tax Rate
ü Commercial and Industrial Property Valuation
ü Per Capita Tax Digest
ü Long-Term Debt Per Capita
ü Fiscal Capacity Index
ü Fiscal Effort Index
ü Human Capital Index
ü Technology in Schools
ü Technical College Graduates
ü Percent of High School Graduates Eligible for HOPE Scholarships
ü Per Capita Fund Expenditures for Public Schools
ü Homeownership Rate
ü Voter Participation Rate
ü Availability of Freeport
ü Attention from Statewide Developers
Socioeconomic Performance Evaluation Matrix
The following matrix illustrates Tattnall
County’s socioeconomic position, relative to the average for its counterparts
within its region, labor market area, peer group, and the state. A plus (+) score signals that it fared
better, within the most recent year or time period; an equal (=) score
indicates that it fared average, and a minus (-) score means that it fared worse.
Tattnall County’s Socioeconomic Performance
Evaluation Matrix
|
Measure |
Region |
LMA |
Peer Group |
State |
|
|
Population Growth |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
Per Capita Income Growth |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
Job Growth |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
|
Unemployment Rate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Bank Deposits Per Capita |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
Manufacturing Employment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Average Weekly Wages in
Manufacturing |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Poverty Rate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Teenage Pregnancy Rate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Infant Mortality Rate |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
|
Food Stamp Participation Rate |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
|
Crime Rate |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
|
Juvenile Arrest Rate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
High School Dropout Rate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Education Test Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average SAT Score |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
Average ITBS Score |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
|
|
*The state figures used in comparison for population
growth and job growth are county averages excluding Tattnall County’s data
from the calculation. State figures
used in comparison for average SAT score and average ITBS score are weighted
averages. Source:
Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute |
|||||
Peer to Peer
Evaluation Matrix
The following matrix illustrates how Tattnall
County compares to its peers according to various measures relating to fiscal
strength, human capital, technology assets, civic participation, and economic
development competitive issues. A “á”
indicates that Tattnall County’s measure is higher than that for its peer. A “â”
indicates that the county’s measure is lower than that for its peer. A “=” indicates that the
county’s measure is equivalent to that for its peer.
Tattnall County’s Peer-to-Peer Evaluation
Matrix
|
Measure |
Dodge |
Wayne |
Worth |
|
Tax Rate |
á |
á |
á |
|
Commercial and Industrial Property Valuation* |
â |
â |
â |
|
Per Capita Tax Digest |
á |
â |
â |
|
Long-term Debt Per Capita |
â |
â |
â |
|
Fiscal Capacity Index |
â |
â |
â |
|
Fiscal Effort Index |
á |
â |
á |
|
Human Capital Index |
â |
â |
â |
|
Technology
in Schools (Students Per Computer) |
â |
á |
á |
|
Technical
College Graduates |
á |
á |
á |
|
Percent of High School Graduates Eligible for HOPE
Scholarships |
â |
â |
á |
|
Per Capita Fund Expenditures for Public Schools |
â |
â |
â |
|
Homeownership Rate |
â |
â |
â |
|
Voter Participation Rate |
á |
â |
â |
|
Availability of Freeport |
á |
á |
= |
|
Attention from Statewide Developers |
â |
â |
= |
|
*Tattnall
County is currently undergoing a property value reassessment. Source:
Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute |
|||
Population is the number of people who live in a community.
As
its population jumped 25 percent from 1990 to 2000,Tattnall County gained over
4,500 new residents and exceeded the average growth rate for counties within
its region, LMA and peer group.
Normally, this indicates that more residents have moved in than out. See
Table 1.
Normally, significant growth in population signals an increase in the community’s ability to attract residents. However, there are other factors lending partial explanation in Tattnall County. A portion of Tattnall County’s population growth during the past decade can be explained by the opening of Smith State Prison in Glennville in 1993. As of 2002, this prison housed approximately 1,175 inmates, accounting for approximately one-fourth of the population growth.
|
Population |
1970 |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
|
Tattnall
County |
16,554 |
18,102 |
17,722 |
22,305 |
|
Regional
Average |
12,070 |
13,641 |
13,991 |
15,662 |
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
12,950 |
17,351 |
19,767 |
22,984 |
|
Peer
Group Average |
16,191 |
18,655 |
19,902 |
22,568 |
|
State
Average |
29,043 |
34,608 |
40,889 |
51,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Change |
1970-1980 |
1980-1990 |
1990-2000 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
1,548 |
(380) |
4,583 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
1,572 |
350 |
1,671 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
4,401 |
2,416 |
3,218 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
2,463 |
1,248 |
2,665 |
|
|
State
Average |
5,565 |
6,281 |
10,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Change |
1970-1980 |
1980-1990 |
1990-2000 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
9.4% |
-2.1% |
25.9% |
|
|
Regional
Average |
13.0% |
2.6% |
11.9% |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
34.0% |
13.9% |
16.3% |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
15.2% |
6.7% |
13.4% |
|
|
State
Average |
19.2% |
18.1% |
26.4% |
|
|
Note: Figures for
Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, Peer Group Average, and State Average
represent the county average for each geographic grouping and exclude
Tattnall County’s data in the calculation. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Census Bureau |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1 below compares the population in
Tattnall County to the average for counties in its region, LMA, peer group, and
state for the years 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000.

Per Capita Income
Per
capita income is the average income earned by each resident in a
community. It is calculated by dividing
the community’s total income by total population. It can be inferred that the higher the per capita income, the
higher the buying power of the average resident.
Tattnall
County has experienced a significant increase in its per capita income. From 1980 to 1990, the county’s growth
exceeded the rate for the state and the average county in its region, labor
market area, and peer group. From 1990
to 2000, such growth continued to outpace that of its labor market area and
peer group. Tattnall’s per capita
income is higher than the average for counties in its peer group, labor market
area, and region. See Table 2. In 2000, Tattnall County’s per capita income
was higher than each of its three peer group counterparts, six of its eight
labor market counterparts, and 12 of its 16 region counterparts.
Table 2
Per Capita Income Shifts
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: Figures for Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average,
and Peer Group represent the county average for each geographic grouping and
exclude Tattnall County’s data in the calculation. Figures for the State are the actual figures reported. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Economic Analysis |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure
2 compares the per capita income in Tattnall County to the average for counties
in its region, labor market area, peer group, and state for the years 1980,
1990, and 2000.
Job Growth
Job growth is
an important economic measure as it reflects an increase in employment
opportunities for residents within a community. It represents a net change that is calculated as the difference
in employment between two selected years.
Communities experiencing job growth are creating more jobs than are
being lost.
Over 2,000 new
jobs have been created in Tattnall County since 1990. Such growth is notably impressive, and exceeds the percentage
growth of the average county within its region, labor market area, and peer
group. See Table 3.
|
Jobs |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
|
Tattnall
County |
6,520 |
7,580 |
9,627 |
|
Regional
Average |
5,676 |
6,486 |
7,618 |
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
8,080 |
8,975 |
11,177 |
|
Peer
Group Average |
6,920 |
7,460 |
8,728 |
|
State
Average |
17,167 |
23,066 |
30,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jobs
Created (Lost) |
1980-1990 |
1990-2000 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
1,060 |
2,047 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
809 |
1,132 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
895 |
2,202 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
540 |
1,268 |
|
|
State
Average |
5,899 |
7,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Growth (Decline) |
1980-1990 |
1990-2000 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
16.3% |
27.0% |
|
|
Regional
Average |
14.3% |
17.5% |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
11.1% |
24.5% |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
7.8% |
17.0% |
|
|
State
Average |
34.4% |
31.7% |
|
|
Note:
Figures for Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, Peer Group Average, and
State Average represent the county average for each geographic grouping and
exclude Tattnall County’s data in the calculation. Source:
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis |
Figure 3 compares total jobs in Tattnall County to the average for counties in its region, labor market area, peer group, and state for the years 1980, 1990, and 2000.

The
unemployment rate reflects the percentage of the civilian labor force that is
not employed. It is calculated by
dividing the number of unemployed persons by the number of people composing the
civilian labor force (number of employed and unemployed persons 16 years and
older) and multiplying by 100.
Unemployment
rates typically correspond with general economic cycles. For example, rates dropped significantly all
over Georgia during the latter half of the 1990s, an economic boom period. However, Tattnall County and the average
county within its region and labor market area experienced an increase in
unemployment rates over the past two decades.
The county’s unemployment rates are significantly higher than the
average for its peer group, labor market area, and region. See Table 4.
In
2000, Tattnall County’s unemployment rate was higher than that of each of its
three peer group counterparts, five of its eight labor market area
counterparts, and nine of its 16 region counterparts.
|
Unemployment
Rate |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
|
||
|
Tattnall
County |
5.0 |
5.2 |
7.9 |
|
||
|
Regional
Average |
6.6 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
|
||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
6.4 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
|
||
|
Peer
Group Average |
6.7 |
6.3 |
5.6 |
|
||
|
State
Average |
7.2 |
5.4 |
3.7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-2000 |
|
|
||
|
Tattnall
County |
0.2 |
2.7 |
|
|
||
|
Regional
Average |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
|
||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
|
|
||
|
Peer
Group Average |
-0.4 |
-0.7 |
|
|
||
|
State
Average |
-1.8 |
-1.7 |
|
|
||
|
Note: Figures for
Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer Group Average represent the county
average for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s data in
the calculation. Figures for the
State are the actual figures reported. Source: Georgia Department of Labor |
|
|||||
|
Figure 4 compares the unemployment rate in
Tattnall County to the average for counties in its region, labor market area,
peer group, and the state for the years 1980, 1990, and 2000. |
|||||||

Bank Deposits Per Capita
Bank deposits per capita is defined as the community’s total deposits in financial institutions divided by its total population. It reflects the level of potential investment income in a community.
Tattnall
County’s bank deposits per capita jumped significantly from 1990 to 2000. In 2000, the county’s bank deposits per
capita exceeded the average for counties within its region, labor market area,
and state. These deposits have grown by
more than $4,000 per person per decade for the past 20 years. See Table 5. In 2000, Tattnall’s bank deposits per capita were higher than
each of its three peer group counterparts, five of its eight labor market area
counterparts, and eight of its 16 regional counterparts.
|
Bank
Deposits Per Capita |
1980 |
1990 |
1999 |
|
Tattnall
County |
2,740 |
6,815 |
11,196 |
|
Regional
Average |
2,708 |
7,928 |
10,959 |
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
2,254 |
6,822 |
9,684 |
|
Peer
Group Average |
2,042 |
6,225 |
8,286 |
|
State |
2,828 |
10,503 |
12,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1999 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
4,074 |
4,381 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
5,220 |
3,031 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
4,568 |
2,862 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
4,182 |
2,061 |
|
|
State |
7,675 |
1,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Growth (Decline) |
1980-1990 |
1990-1999 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
148.7% |
64.3% |
|
|
Regional
Average |
192.7% |
38.2% |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
202.7% |
42.0% |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
204.8% |
33.1% |
|
|
State |
271.4% |
18.7% |
|
Note: Figures for Regional
Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer Group Average represent the county
average for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s data in the
calculation. Figures for the State are
the actual figures reported.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta
Figure
5 compares the bank deposits per capita in Tattnall County to the average for
counties in its region, labor market area, peer group, and the state for the
years 1980, 1990, and 1999.
Manufacturing Employment
Following prevailing trends in Georgia, Tattnall County’s share of manufacturing jobs dropped notably from 1990 to 1998; this after it showed a 3.2 percent growth in the previous decade. Tattnall County’s share of manufacturing jobs in 1998 was lower than the average for the counties within its region, labor market area, peer group, and the state. These trends, coupled with the county’s overall job growth, signals that other industry sectors are accounting for a larger share of Tattnall County’s employment base and are increasing significantly in their importance to the community’s economic future. See Table 6.
|
Manufacturing
Share |
1980 |
1990 |
1998 |
|
Tattnall
County |
13.0% |
16.2% |
9.2% |
|
Regional
Average |
26.2% |
25.8% |
19.3% |
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
18.9% |
18.1% |
16.3% |
|
Peer
Group Average |
25.2% |
20.5% |
14.1% |
|
State
Average |
19.3% |
15.6% |
12.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1998 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
3.2% |
-7.0% |
|
|
Regional
Average |
-0.4% |
-6.6% |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
-0.8% |
-1.8% |
|
|
Peer Group Average |
-4.7% |
-6.4% |
|
|
State
Average |
-3.8% |
-2.9% |
|
|
Note: Figures for
Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer Group Average represent the
county average for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s
data in the calculation. Figures for
the State are the actual figures reported.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Economic Analysis |
||||
Figure 6 compares the manufacturing share of
employment in Tattnall County to the average for counties in its region, labor
market area, peer group, and state for the years 1980, 1990, and 1998.

Average Weekly Wage in Manufacturing
Average weekly wage in manufacturing reflects the earning potential available in what continues to be a significant industry sector for rural areas. It is calculated by dividing total annual wages in manufacturing by total employment in manufacturing, then dividing this total by 52.
Tattnall County’s manufacturing base is composed significantly of low-wage jobs, as is that for its region. The county’s growth in average weekly wages from 1995 to 1999 exceeded the average for counties within its region, labor market area, peer group, and state. However, Tattnall County still had the lowest weekly average wage in manufacturing compared to the average for these comparison groups. There is a significant disparity in the earnings figures between Tattnall County and its peer group, or counties that are most similar from an economic development perspective. See Table 7.
Average weekly wages in manufacturing within Tattnall County is lower than each of its three peer group counterparts, seven of its eight labor market area counterparts, and 12 of its 16 regional counterparts.
|
Average
Manufacturing Wage |
1980 |
1990 |
1999 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
212 |
228 |
324 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
262 |
334 |
402 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
337 |
426 |
459 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
342 |
388 |
530 |
|
|
State
Average |
449 |
555 |
683 |
|
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1999 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
16 |
96 |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
72 |
68 |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
89 |
33 |
|
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
46 |
142 |
|
|
|
State
Average |
106 |
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1999 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
7.5% |
42.1% |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
27.4% |
20.4% |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
26.5% |
7.8% |
|
|
|
Peer Group
Average |
13.5% |
36.7% |
|
|
|
State
Average |
23.6% |
23.1% |
|
|
|
Note: Figures for
Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer Group Average represent the
county average for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s
data in the calculation. Figures for
the State are the actual figures reported. Source:
Georgia Department of Labor |
|||||
Figure 7 compares the average weekly wage in manufacturing in Tattnall County to the average for counties in its region, labor market area, peer group, and state for the years 1990, 1995, and 1999.

Poverty
Rate
Poverty rate is the percentage of persons living below the poverty level. Such persons lack the economic means to support their basic needs.
Despite the growth in per capita income and bank deposits per capita, Tattnall County’s poverty rate continued to be rather high in 1997 as more than one-fourth of its residents were impoverished. The county is located within a region and labor market area with average poverty rates higher than the rate for the state as a whole. While Tattnall’s poverty rate has decreased some since 1989, it remains higher than the average for counties within its peer group, labor market area, and region. See Table 8. Tattnall County’s poverty rate in 1997 was higher than each of its three peer group counterparts, seven of its eight labor market area counterparts, and 11 of its 16 regional counterparts.
|
Poverty
Rate |
1989 |
1997 |
|
|||||
|
Tattnall
County |
27.8 |
25.6 |
|
|||||
|
Regional
Average |
23.7 |
23.3 |
|
|||||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
22.8 |
22.6 |
|
|||||
|
Peer
Group Average |
23.4 |
22.3 |
|
|||||
|
State |
14.9 |
14.7 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Actual
Change |
1989-1997 |
|
|
|||||
|
Tattnall
County |
-2.2 |
|
|
|||||
|
Regional
Average |
-0.4 |
|
|
|||||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
-0.2 |
|
|
|||||
|
Peer
Group Average |
-1.2 |
|
|
|||||
|
State |
-0.2 |
|
|
|||||
|
Percent
Growth (Decline) |
1989-1993 |
|
|
|||||
|
Tattnall
County |
-7.9% |
|
|
|||||
|
Regional
Average |
-1.7% |
|
|
|||||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
-1.0% |
|
|
|||||
|
Peer
Group Average |
-5.0% |
|
|
|||||
|
State |
-1.3% |
|
|
|||||
|
Note: Figures for Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer Group Average represent the county average for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s data in the calculation. Figures for the State are the actual figures reported. Source: Georgia Department of Human
Resources. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Figure
8 compares the poverty rate in Tattnall County to the average for counties in
its region, labor market area, peer group, and state for the years 1989 and
1997.

Teenage Pregnancy Rate
Teenage pregnancy rate is the number of pregnancies between the ages of 10 and 19 per 1,000. Higher rates reflect a higher incidence of pregnancy among teens. Pregnant teens are typically single and less likely to complete high school or pursue an advanced education. A high teenage pregnancy rate signals that there is a risk to the community’s future earning potential.
While average rates dropped in the region, labor market area, peer group and state since 1980, the opposite was true for Tattnall County. The county has historically posted comparatively high rates. In 1998, 68 per 1,000 teen women in Tattnall County were pregnant. This is a critical issue for the community. See Table 9.
Tattnall
County’s teenage pregnancy rate in 1998 was higher than every county within its
peer group, labor market area, and region, and the third highest among Georgia
counties.
|
Teenage
Pregnancy Rate |
1980 |
1990 |
1998 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
66.4 |
68.9 |
68.0 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
53.2 |
52.9 |
47.7 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
60.5 |
62.6 |
51.7 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
54.8 |
59.6 |
37.0 |
|
|
State |
58.9 |
60.3 |
44.0 |
|
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1998 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
2.5 |
-0.9 |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
-0.2 |
-5.2 |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
2.1 |
-10.9 |
|
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
4.8 |
-22.6 |
|
|
|
State |
1.4 |
-16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Growth (Decline) |
1980-1990 |
1990-1998 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
3.8% |
-1.4% |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
-0.4% |
-9.9% |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
3.4% |
-17.4% |
|
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
8.8% |
-37.9% |
|
|
|
State |
2.4% |
-27.0% |
|
|
|
Note: Figures for Regional Average, Georgia LMA
Average, Peer Group Average, and State Average represent the county average
for each geographic grouping and exclude Tattnall County’s data in the
calculation. Figures for the State
are the actual figures reported. Sources: Georgia Department of Human
Resources; U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. |
|||||
Figure 9 compares the teenage pregnancy rate in Tattnall
County to the average for counties in its region, labor market area, peer
group, and state for the years 1980, 1990, and 1998.
Infant Mortality Rate
Infant mortality rate represents the deaths of infants less than one year of age (excluding fetal deaths) per 1,000 births. This measure, in part, reflects the level of health care available to newborns.
Tattnall
County has a relatively low infant mortality rate compared to the average for
the counties within its region, labor market area, peer group, and the state.
See Table 10.
|
Infant
Mortality Rate |
1980 |
1990 |
1998 |
|
|
Tattnall
County |
14.4 |
3.7 |
5.5 |
|
|
Regional
Average |
14.5 |
13.2 |
9.4 |
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
17.7 |
9.8 |
10.0 |
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
17.1 |
15.9 |
8.3 |
|
|
State |
14.7 |
12.4 |
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Change |
1980-1990 |
1990-1998 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
-10.8 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
-1.3 |
-3.8 |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
-7.9 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
-1.2 |
-7.6 |
|
|
|
State |
-2.3 |
-3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Growth (Decline) |
1980-1990 |
1990-1998 |
|
|
|
Tattnall
County |
-74.5% |
50.3% |
|
|
|
Regional
Average |
-8.8% |
-28.6% |
|
|
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
-44.8% |
3.0% |
|
|
|
Peer
Group Average |
-7.2% |
-47.7% |
|
|
|
State |
-15.8% |
-31.6% |
|
|
|
Notes: (1) Figures for Regional Average, Georgia LMA Average, and Peer
Group Average represent the county average for each geographic grouping and
exclude Tattnall County’s data in the calculation. Figures for the State are
the actual figures reported. (2)
Large year-to-year variation in infant mortality rates at the county level is
often reflective of absolute numbers that are very small, as is the case in
Tattnall County. For example, the
number of infant deaths in Tattnall County has ranged from 1 to 4 since
1980. Source: Georgia Department of
Human Resources |
|||||
Figure
10 compares the infant mortality rate in Tattnall County to the average for
counties in its region, labor market area, peer group, and state for the years
1980, 1990, and 1998.

Food Stamp Participation Rate
Food stamp participation rate is the number of food stamp recipients per 1,000 residents. This rate is a measure of community self-sufficiency such that the higher the rate, the lower the ability to provide for basic food needs.
Tattnall County’s food stamp participation rate in 2000 was higher than that for the state as was the average for its region, labor market area, and peer group. While in 1995, the county’s rate exceeded that of the average county in its comparable groupings, the opposite was true in 2000. See Table 11.
Tattnall
County’s food stamp participate rate in 2000 was lower than two of its three
peer group counterparts, five of its eight labor market area counterparts, and
five of its 16 regional counterparts.
|
Food
Stamp Participation Rate |
1990 |
1995 |
2000 |
|
||||
|
Tattnall
County |
137.2 |
173.0 |
101.6 |
|
||||
|
Regional
Average |
133.7 |
171.3 |
124.2 |
|
||||
|
Georgia
LMA Average |
126.2 |
171.9 |
117.8 |
|
||||
|
Peer
Group Average |
139.4 |
167.9 |
108.4 |
|
||||
|
State
Average |
78.2 |
116.5 |
66.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Actual
Change |
1990-1995 |
1995-2000 |
|
|
||||
|
Tattnall
County |
35.8 |
-71.4 |
|
|
||||
|
Regional
Average |
37.6 |
| ||||||